I just got back from two week of doing Coast Guard checkrides in New England. I don't even want to guess what the glide ration would be on a two seater. Is it possible for it to be a negative number?....Seriously, a dead stick landing would be more like a helicopter autorotation!
I haven't messed to much with single engine work, but I can climb. I haven't measured it yet, but I don't think that it's very fast. My Lazair's performance numbers are similar to Tyler's:
Takeoff and climb at 30.
Power off stall at 25.
Cruise at 40.
Approach at 40.
The only difference is that I can definitely exceed VNE if I were to firewall the throttles in level flight.
I should have some new props to install next Monday....sweet.
Dave
Statistics: Posted by uscgairdale — Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:25 am
]]>
sustainflight - i don't think there is a lazairhead out there who would know any particular performance speed numbers for a lazair, nor stares at their ASI during any phase of flight.
the two seater has one speed - 40mph. you climb at 30, thats about the only different one. cruise 40, approach 40, full power maybe you see 45
i think a lazair just needs two positions on an ASI
1. flying
2. not flying
its a perfect day to fly here and i'm stuck at work - booooooo
Tyler
Edmonton, AB
Statistics: Posted by JPXman — Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:12 pm
]]>
If you have hands off at 40 then trim is good. Ideally you wouldn't want to add weight.
You may have answered your own question. You may be getting much more drag with the 44" props than you were accustomed to with the 28" Bi-props. This may explain why holding a little power produces a better landing. Additionally the 185's do produce a few pounds of thrust at idle.
I have always wondered about any negative aspects of switching to re-drives and 44's on 185's. One question in particular I never could get an answer for was engine at idle sink rate.
Statistics: Posted by Shannon — Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:03 pm
]]>
How do I know for sure that the balance is good? I have the trim tabs down about 15-20 degrees to fly hands off at about 40mph airspeed. Would more weight in the nose or tail make it fly better?
The last time I landed without power, I purposely pointed the nose down to keep the airspeed up, then flared, but the response was quit sluggish, and I landed a little hard. I had a few other landings and they were a bit hard too. If I land with power on, I can land smoothly.
I will look at the ailerons first, to see if they need adjusting. Thanks for your input, Daffy
Statistics: Posted by daffy1029 — Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:52 pm
]]>
Weight shouldn't degrade the glide angle; it just causes you to fly down the glide-slope faster (higher sink rate).
For an enclosed Series III with a 200-lb pilot, does anyone have data (manual or experimental) indicating what the best glide (shallowest glide angle) speed is?
What about speed for lowest sink rate (slower airspeed than above, but worse glide angle)?
Craig
Statistics: Posted by sustainflight — Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:07 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>